Editorial Policy

Everything published here goes through the same process. This page describes it so the Team byline means something checkable rather than something anonymous.

How topics get chosen

We start from what people are actually searching for and what they are actually saying in public community discussions, then discard anything that falls outside what this site is for.

Discarded on principle, regardless of how much traffic it would bring:

How a page gets written

  1. Draft against a specific question a reader arrived with.
  2. Source check — every factual claim either carries a source or gets softened until it is only claiming what we can support. When there is no source, we lower the strength of the claim rather than invent one.
  3. Language check — an automated gate scans for framings this community has repeatedly said it does not want. See below.
  4. Publish, with the last-updated date reflecting real edits.

What the automated checks refuse

A page cannot be published if it contains:

These are enforced by a script that runs before publication, not by memory. The check has its own test suite, including cases that must not trigger it — so that writing honestly about these topics remains possible.

Language we deliberately avoid

We do not use functioning labels. We do not describe autism or ADHD as a superpower, and we do not describe them as suffering. We use both identity-first and person-first language depending on context, because the community itself is split and neither side speaks for everyone.

If we describe an experience, it is either sourced or clearly marked as a composite illustration. We do not present invented anecdotes as real ones.

Updates and corrections

Pages are revised when the underlying information changes or when a reader tells us something is wrong. Substantive changes are logged on the corrections page. The updated date on a page reflects an actual edit — we do not refresh dates to look current.